The scoping targets, stated as assumptions rather than promised results: reduce reportable incidents within 12 months, which is the lever behind both TRIR and what you pay at insurance renewal. The math is worth doing on your own numbers: take your last three years of lost-time incidents, price each at its direct cost - OSHA fines, medical, lost productivity - and add the premium increases they triggered. That total is what continuous hazard detection is competing against, and for most GCs running 8-12 active projects it clears the cost of the system. On top of prevention, real-time visibility cuts the superintendent hours spent on reactive site walks and shortens corrective-action closure from days to hours, which owners and architects notice.
The return compounds over 12 months as carriers see sustained TRIR improvement and adjust premiums at renewal - a lagging benefit, which is why the first-year case rests on avoided incidents and labor, not premium relief. Subcontractor safety scores become data-driven and objective, which improves bid selection and cuts disputes over performance-based contract clauses. Your actual payback depends on your TRIR baseline and premium structure, and we will tell you if the math does not clear.