Billing & Payments - Maxio (Chargify)
Maxio can handle pricing complexity most billing tools
can't. Most teams still fight it to do the simple stuff.
We configure Maxio's usage-based pricing, ASC 606 revenue recognition, and SaaS metrics so complex B2B billing actually runs cleanly - instead of finance rebuilding the numbers in a spreadsheet every close.
Get your free Maxio (Chargify) AI Opportunity Assessment.
See exactly where AI and automation fit your business - delivered to your inbox. No call required.
Free, personalized assessment. We never share your data.
Operators and teams we've worked with
Most Maxio (Chargify) accounts implement pricing complexity without the revenue-ops discipline to run it
Maxio - the product born from Chargify and SaaSOptics merging into a single billing-and-finance-operations platform - exists specifically for B2B SaaS companies whose pricing has outgrown a simple flat-fee subscription: usage-based components, tiered contracts, mid-cycle upgrades and prorations, and multi-year deals with ramped pricing. That flexibility is exactly why implementations go wrong. Product catalogs get built to model one contract's specific terms instead of a reusable pricing structure, so every new deal shape requires a one-off workaround. ASC 606 revenue recognition schedules get configured once at setup and drift out of sync as contracts get amended. SaaS metrics - ARR, net revenue retention, logo churn - get calculated differently in Maxio than in the board deck, and finance stops trusting either number.
Revenue Institute rebuilds Maxio implementations around a pricing architecture that scales past the deal it was originally built for. We rationalize the product catalog, fix revenue recognition schedules so they reconcile with your actual contract terms, and configure SaaS metrics reporting that finance, the board, and your CRM all agree on.
What we do with Maxio (Chargify)
What we build inside your Maxio instance
Product catalog architecture for complex pricing
We rebuild your product, component, and pricing model structure so usage-based tiers, seat-based pricing, and contract-specific terms are modeled as reusable configuration - not one-off workarounds every time a new deal shape shows up.
ASC 606 revenue recognition accuracy
We audit and rebuild revenue recognition schedules against your actual contract terms, including amendments, ramps, and multi-year deals, so the numbers Maxio reports reconcile with what your auditors and finance team expect at close.
SaaS metrics finance and the board can trust
We configure ARR, MRR, net revenue retention, and churn reporting so the definitions match how your finance team and investors already calculate them - eliminating the reconciliation gap between the platform and the board deck.
Contract and quote-to-cash integration
We connect Maxio to your CRM and CPQ workflow so signed contracts flow into billing without manual re-entry, and configure amendment and renewal handling so mid-cycle changes update revenue recognition automatically.
Usage-based billing pipeline reliability
We audit the usage data ingestion pipeline feeding Maxio's metered billing, fix gaps or delays that cause invoice disputes, and build monitoring so a broken usage feed gets caught before it hits an invoice.
ERP and accounting integration
We connect Maxio to NetSuite, Sage Intacct, or QuickBooks so revenue, deferred revenue, and AR data flow into the general ledger correctly, cutting the manual journal entries most finance teams are still doing at month-end.
Our framework
How a Maxio engagement runs
Audit and diagnosis
We review your product catalog architecture, revenue recognition configuration, SaaS metrics definitions, and every upstream and downstream integration, and produce a prioritized findings document.
Rebuild and configure
We execute against the agreed scope - rebuilding the catalog, fixing revenue recognition schedules, and hardening usage and ERP integrations - working in your live account with documented change history and finance sign-off at each stage.
Handoff and enablement
We hand off a documented system - catalog architecture reference, revenue recognition logic, and metrics definitions - so finance and revenue ops can manage new contract shapes without needing us for every configuration change.
Why Maxio fits complex B2B SaaS billing and where implementations break down
Maxio was built for exactly the pricing complexity that trips up simpler billing tools: usage-based components layered on top of subscription tiers, contract amendments and multi-year ramps, and the ASC 606 revenue recognition rules that come with recognizing revenue on a schedule different from when cash actually arrives. For a B2B SaaS company with genuinely complex contracts, that combined billing-and-finance-operations approach is a real advantage over point solutions that handle invoicing but leave revenue recognition and SaaS metrics as a separate manual exercise.
The failure mode is almost always a mismatch between the platform's capability and the implementation's discipline. Product catalogs get built to model the specific contract that prompted the Maxio purchase, rather than as a generalized pricing structure - so every subsequent deal with slightly different terms becomes a one-off configuration nobody fully documents. Revenue recognition schedules get set up once and don't get revisited when contracts are amended mid-term, which is exactly when ASC 606 compliance gets fragile. SaaS metrics get calculated using Maxio's default definitions without reconciling them against how finance and the board already define ARR, churn, and net revenue retention - so two sources of truth quietly diverge.
What a production-ready Maxio implementation actually looks like
A well-configured Maxio instance has a product catalog architecture that treats pricing variation as configuration rather than exception, revenue recognition schedules that get updated automatically as contracts amend, and SaaS metrics definitions that were explicitly reconciled with finance's methodology rather than left at platform defaults. Usage data flows into billing through a monitored pipeline, and integration with the general ledger means month-end close doesn't depend on a manual spreadsheet reconciliation.
Getting there requires revenue-ops discipline as much as platform configuration - understanding your actual contract terms, your finance team's metric definitions, and where the gaps between them live. Revenue Institute brings that discipline to every Maxio engagement. Explore our full Billing & Payments platform coverage, including Recurly and Stripe, or see how clean billing data plugs into a broader Finance Automation engagement.
We're vendor-agnostic
Other Billing & Payments platforms we specialize in
Not sure Maxio (Chargify) is the right fit? We implement and optimize these too - and we'll tell you honestly which one fits your business.
Maxio (Chargify) questions, answered
What's the difference between Maxio and the old Chargify and SaasOptics products?
Maxio is the combined platform that resulted from Chargify (billing) and SaaSOptics (subscription finance and metrics) merging under one brand. If your team implemented one of the legacy products years ago, there's a real chance the configuration hasn't been updated to take advantage of the combined platform's revenue recognition and metrics capabilities. We audit legacy implementations specifically for this gap.
Can Maxio handle our usage-based and hybrid pricing model without custom development?
In most cases, yes - Maxio's component and pricing model architecture is built for exactly this kind of complexity. The problem we usually find isn't a platform limitation, it's that the catalog was configured to fit one specific contract rather than as a reusable structure. We rebuild the architecture so new pricing variations are configuration, not a support ticket.
Our ARR and churn numbers in Maxio don't match what finance reports to the board. Can you fix that?
Yes - this is one of the most common issues we're brought in to solve. It's almost always a definitional mismatch: how Maxio calculates a metric versus how your finance team or investors define it, often around contraction, reactivation, or mid-cycle amendments. We reconcile the definitions and reconfigure Maxio's reporting so both sides of that comparison agree.
Do you handle ASC 606 revenue recognition specifically?
Yes, this is core to what makes Maxio different from a simpler billing tool, and it's also one of the most commonly misconfigured pieces of an implementation. We audit revenue recognition schedules against your actual contract terms, including amendments and multi-year ramps, and rebuild them so they hold up under audit.
What does a Maxio engagement typically cost and take?
Scope depends on the complexity of your pricing model, how many integrations are involved, and whether revenue recognition needs a full rebuild or targeted repairs. We scope every engagement after a discovery audit so you get a fixed-scope proposal with a specific timeline.
Make Maxio (Chargify) actually earn its keep.
Stop paying for a tool your team routes around. Start running on one they trust.
Tell us about your firm and we'll send back your Maxio (Chargify) AI Opportunity Assessment - by email, no call required.
- A specific plan for your business, not a generic pitch
- Built from a real read of your business, delivered to your inbox
- No call required, no obligation
Get your free Maxio (Chargify) AI Opportunity Assessment.
Free and personalized. We never share your data.
Prefer to talk first? Book a strategy call.