Case Studies/Qualigence
Agentic AI

An AI Sourcing Agent That Cut Sourcing Time 36.2%

36.2%

Sourcing Time Saved

100%

Fit-Scored Before Any Enrichment Spend

Self-improving

Sourcing Rounds

Measured across the firm's searches, the sourcing agent cut sourcing time by 36.2%. The hours moved to where they matter - the conversations with candidates - and the capacity gain came without adding a sourcer to payroll. Enrichment is purchased only after the AI has scored a candidate as a fit. The spend that used to subsidize wrong guesses now...

Context & Challenge

Qualigence is a recruiting and talent firm. Sourcing is the grind under every search: writing search strings, combing profiles, judging fit one by one, and paying for data enrichment on candidates who were never right to begin with. It is skilled work - and it is also the first hours of a recruiter's day, every day.

The Challenge

Recruiting margins live and die on sourcing hours. Every search starts the same way: a recruiter translates the role into search strings, pages through profiles, judges fit one by one, and pays for contact data on their best guesses - including the guesses that turn out wrong. Off-the-shelf AI sourcing tools promise to fix this and mostly relocate the problem: they return long lists of weak matches, so the recruiter still does the judging, now with worse raw material. Qualigence needed the judgment automated, not just the searching.

Our Solution

#### The Full First Pass, Automated Revenue Institute built a sourcing agent that runs the full first pass of a search. From a job description, it constructs the search queries a senior sourcer would write, sweeps the public web for matching profiles, and - before any paid enrichment - grades every candidate for fit on a 1-to-10 scale against the role.

#### Spend Only on Scored Fits Only candidates who clear the bar get enriched with verified contact data, so the data budget follows the AI's judgment instead of funding its mistakes.

#### Recruiters Train It With a Thumb Recruiters stay in command with a simple thumbs up or thumbs down on the agent's picks; the system converts that feedback into sharper include-and-exclude filters for the next round, so it learns the firm's taste for every role.

#### Blocked From Making Things Up Because the agent drafts candidate-facing material downstream, it is mechanically blocked from fabricating: any claim it cannot trace to a real source becomes a bracketed gap for a human to fill, never an invention.

The Results

#### 36.2% of Sourcing Time, Returned Measured across the firm's searches, the sourcing agent cut sourcing time by 36.2%. The hours moved to where they matter - the conversations with candidates - and the capacity gain came without adding a sourcer to payroll.

#### Data Spend Follows Judgment Enrichment is purchased only after the AI has scored a candidate as a fit. The spend that used to subsidize wrong guesses now follows a graded shortlist.

#### It Gets Sharper Every Round Recruiter feedback is not a satisfaction survey - it is training signal. Every thumbs up or down rewrites the next round's filters, so the agent converges on what a great candidate looks like for each client and role.

#### Trust, Enforced by the System Everything the agent writes traces to a real source - enforced by gates the software will not open, not by policy. For a firm whose product is its credibility with candidates, that guarantee is the feature.

> "If you're an operations leader who wants to see what AI actually looks like in practice - not in a demo, but in your business - this is the team." > - Janelle Osborne, COO, Qualigence

Key Results Achieved

  • 36.2% Sourcing Time Saved

  • Data Spend Follows Judgment

  • Sharper Every Round

Ready to be the next case study?

Book a 30-minute strategy call. We'll walk through where the biggest opportunities are in your business.